Skip to content

    A real board meeting, word for word

    The company is made up. Everything the board says below is what it actually answered on October 23, 2026, with the same prompts and models as your free first meeting. Nothing rewritten, nothing picked for looks.

    What the board knows (the sample company profile)

    Acme Analytics · B2B SaaS · Seed

    Product analytics for small B2B SaaS teams. One founder plus one contract engineer. 120 paying customers on a single $29/month plan (about $3,500 MRR), growing 4% a month, 4% monthly churn. 9 months of runway from a small pre-seed. Most signups come from our blog's pricing-page teardowns. Direct competitors charge $49 to $99 a month.

    Should we raise our price from $29 to $49 a month?

    1. Mike

      Chief Technology Officer

      Approve

      Two to three weeks of engineering for one contract engineer to add a $49 plan in Stripe, implement upgrade/downgrade flows, and update the pricing page. The founder should handle QA and rollout testing.

      Blind spot: Higher churn risk if value doesn't rise; plan migrations and upgrade messaging may be needed.

    2. Lara

      Chief Product Officer

      Reject

      Raising to $49 risks churn before we prove enough value. Onboarding at the current price hasn’t shown scalable value to justify a higher tier.

      Blind spot: We haven't run a price-sensitivity test or value-based upgrades yet.

    3. Bill

      Chief Financial Officer

      Reject

      Run a staged price uptick to $39 and measure churn vs signups over 3–6 months, given our 9-month runway, with existing customers grandfathered.

      Blind spot: You have no elasticity data; price sensitivity in this segment is unknown and could break retention.

    4. Sofia

      Chief Marketing Officer

      Reject

      We have 120 customers with 4% monthly churn; a $20 price lift could hurt pricing-page teardowns signups more than it improves revenue given our growth pace.

      Blind spot: No price-elasticity test tied to teardown content to quantify willingness-to-pay.

    5. Jordan

      Chief Operating Officer

      Reject

      Price up would spike founder workload and support needs; we’re onboarding ~5 new signups/month and losing ~5 customers monthly with only a contract engineer. Founder onboarding/support currently consumes about 10 hours/month.

      Blind spot: We underestimate how price signaling affects activation work and support load.

    Board verdict

    Do not proceed

    1 approve4 reject

    Risks

    • Churn increase reducing recurring revenue
    • Unknown price elasticity for core segment
    • Acquisition funnel shrink from teardown content

    Next step

    Run 8-week price-sensitivity A/B test on new signups starting 2026-11-01

    Executives: gpt-5-nano · Verdict: gpt-5-mini. In your meeting you can push back with follow-up questions; the board answers each one.

    Bring your own decision

    First board meeting free · No card required